dmit：sPro vps测评 – 去程 Cloudflare Magic Transit 加持，回程 GIA 抗DDOS

文章目录 展开

最近dmit推出全新的 sPro 系列套餐，去程 Cloudflare Magic Transit 加持，回程 GIA，旨在提供高速低延迟网络的同时也为您带来 CF 级别的 DDoS 防御。该套餐全称 PVM.LAX.sPro.CREATOR，配置均可定制。

去程cf加持的线路，抗DDOS 的cn2 gia，还没测评过，这篇文章就来测评一下，看看数据。dmit的机器购买教程可以了解下。

DMIT服务器购买和使用指南 – 这家的VPS价格略高

sPro套餐测试IP

测试IP：45.88.194.36

1、测评机器

官网：https://www.dmit.io/

8折优惠码：SPRO-20OFF

sPro 系列套餐，去程 Cloudflare Magic Transit 加持，回程 GIA，配置可以自选，这里列出了一个最便宜的。

PVM.LAX.sPro.CREATOR
$14.90/月（8折之后$11.92/月）
2+ vCPU
2+ GB RAM
20+ GB SSD Storage
1000+ GB Bandwidth @100Mbps+
1 IPv4 & 1 IPv6 /64
5Tbps+ DDoS Protection Always-On
默认100M带宽
购买链接

2、配置信息

AMD的cpu，性能强劲，磁盘io分数很高。

----------------------------------------------------------------------
 CPU Model             : AMD EPYC 7402P 24-Core Processor
 CPU Cores             : 2
 CPU Frequency         : 2794.748 MHz
 CPU Cache             : 512 KB
 Total Disk            : 20.0 GB (2.5 GB Used)
 Total Mem             : 1829 MB (135 MB Used)
 Total Swap            : 0 MB (0 MB Used)
 System uptime         : 0 days, 11 hour 12 min
 Load average          : 0.00, 0.00, 0.00
 OS                    : CentOS 8.3.2011
 Arch                  : x86_64 (64 Bit)
 Kernel                : 4.18.0-147.8.1.el8_1.x86_64
 TCP CC                : cubic
 Virtualization        : KVM
 Organization          : AS54574 DMIT Cloud Services
 Location              : Los Angeles / US
 Region                : California
----------------------------------------------------------------------
 I/O Speed(1st run)    : 890 MB/s
 I/O Speed(2nd run)    : 923 MB/s
 I/O Speed(3rd run)    : 898 MB/s
 Average I/O speed     : 903.7 MB/s

2、其他杂项

IP非原生，应该是广播过去的。能看hbo~~

-> Network Information

 IPV4 - IP Address:	[HK] 45.88.194.*
 IPV4 - ASN Info:	54574 (DMIT - DMIT Cloud Services, US)
 IPV4 - Region:		China Hong Kong 
 IPV6 - IP Address:	[US] 2605:52c0:2:7bf::
 IPV6 - ASN Info:	54574 (DMIT - DMIT Cloud Services, US)
 IPV6 - Region:		United States United States 

 -> Media Unlock Test

 HBO Now:				Yes
 Bahamut Anime:				No
 Abema.TV:				No
 Princess Connect Re:Dive Japan:	No
 BBC:					No
 Bilibili China Mainland Only:		No
 Bilibili Hongkong/Macau/Taiwan:	Yes
 Bilibili Taiwan Only:			No

 -> CPU Performance Test (Fast Mode, 1-Pass @ 5sec)

 1 Thread Test:			1610 Scores
 2 Threads Test:		3234 Scores

 -> Memory Performance Test (Fast Mode, 1-Pass @ 5sec)

 1 Thread - Read Test :		42071.19 MB/s
 1 Thread - Write Test:		18329.03 MB/s

 -> Disk Speed Test (4K Block/1M Block, Direct Mode)

 Test Name		Write Speed				Read Speed
 100MB-4K Block		42.8 MB/s (0.10 IOPS, 2.45 s)		52.4 MB/s (12793 IOPS, 2.00 s)
 1GB-1M Block		952 MB/s (908 IOPS, 1.10 s)		295 MB/s (281 IOPS, 3.56 s)

3、speed测试

电信和移动不错，联通拉跨！

ID    测速服务器信息       上传/Mbps   下载/Mbps   延迟/ms
3633  电信|上海　　　　　　↑ 95.58     ↓ 99.68     130.86  
24012 电信|内蒙古呼和浩特　↑ 83.66     ↓ 99.07     165.84  
17145 电信|安徽合肥５Ｇ　　↑ 98.02     ↓ 101.34    150.08  
27594 电信|广东广州５Ｇ　　↑ 47.85     ↓ 72.37     165.95  
27575 电信|新疆乌鲁木齐　　↑ 73.16     ↓ 101.77    203.49  
5396  电信|江苏苏州５Ｇ　　↑ 93.20     ↓ 103.86    133.65  
23844 电信|湖北武汉　　　　↑ 94.73     ↓ 100.77    177.96  
29353 电信|湖北武汉５Ｇ　　↑ 82.24     ↓ 103.19    173.09  
28225 电信|湖南长沙５Ｇ　　↑ 2.11      ↓ 73.20     165.84  
3973  电信|甘肃兰州　　　　↑ 88.30     ↓ 100.69    169.69  
24447 联通|上海５Ｇ　　　　↑ 1.45      ↓ 105.55    325.33  
5145  联通|北京　　　　　　↑ 0.80      ↓ 41.32     324.42  
2461  联通|四川成都　　　　↑ 2.31      ↓ 39.75     353.62  
27154 联通|天津５Ｇ　　　　↑ 1.40      ↓ 33.96     262.70  
26180 联通|山东济南５Ｇ　　↑ 2.14      ↓ 51.67     249.76  
26678 联通|广东广州５Ｇ　　↑ 1.21      ↓ 22.99     231.83  
13704 联通|江苏南京　　　　↑ 1.98      ↓ 30.52     232.31  
5485  联通|湖北武汉　　　　↑ 4.84      ↓ 53.79     234.34  
4870  联通|湖南长沙　　　　↑ 0.78      ↓ 51.08     249.46  
4863  联通|陕西西安　　　　↑ 0.90      ↓ 42.23     241.97  
30232 移动|内蒙呼和浩特５Ｇ↑ 97.06     ↓ 98.02     179.22  
25858 移动|北京　　　　　　↑ 95.47     ↓ 103.70    173.32  
17184 移动|天津５Ｇ　　　　↑ 99.45     ↓ 103.41    178.22  
26938 移动|新疆乌鲁木齐５Ｇ↑ 96.76     ↓ 102.36    209.92  
16171 移动|福建福州　　　　↑ 93.04     ↓ 103.48    190.03  
16398 移动|贵州贵阳　　　　↑ 88.86     ↓ 105.75    202.80

4、路由测试

电信去程

去程确实是走了163，然后走了cf的线路！

电信回程

回程cn2 gia无疑！！

Traceroute to China, Shanghai CT (TCP Mode, Max 30 Hop)
============================================================
traceroute to 180.153.28.5 (180.153.28.5), 30 hops max, 60 byte packets
 1  154.17.0.1  5.96 ms  AS174,AS54574  United States California Los Angeles cogentco.com
 2  193.41.248.225  0.40 ms  AS54574  United States California Los Angeles dmit.io
 3  193.41.248.130  0.79 ms  AS54574  United States California Los Angeles dmit.io
 4  59.43.181.145  125.93 ms  *  China Shanghai ChinaTelecom
 5  *
 6  59.43.130.217  129.89 ms  *  China Shanghai ChinaTelecom
 7  59.43.80.82  131.40 ms  *  China Shanghai ChinaTelecom
 8  61.152.24.5  135.07 ms  AS4812  China Shanghai ChinaTelecom
 9  *
10  124.74.232.54  133.85 ms  AS4811  China Shanghai ChinaTelecom
11  101.227.255.34  132.37 ms  AS4812  China Shanghai ChinaTelecom
12  180.153.28.5  129.08 ms  AS4812  China Shanghai ChinaTelecom
Traceroute to China, Beijing CT (TCP Mode, Max 30 Hop)
============================================================
traceroute to 180.149.128.9 (180.149.128.9), 30 hops max, 60 byte packets
 1  154.17.0.1  7.21 ms  AS174,AS54574  United States California Los Angeles cogentco.com
 2  193.41.248.225  0.30 ms  AS54574  United States California Los Angeles dmit.io
 3  193.41.248.130  0.94 ms  AS54574  United States California Los Angeles dmit.io
 4  59.43.184.157  125.95 ms  *  China Shanghai ChinaTelecom
 5  59.43.182.233  170.48 ms  *  China Beijing ChinaTelecom
 6  *
 7  59.43.132.9  156.57 ms  *  China Beijing ChinaTelecom
 8  *
 9  36.110.244.46  173.32 ms  AS23724  China Beijing ChinaTelecom
10  36.110.246.198  156.78 ms  AS23724  China Beijing ChinaTelecom
11  *
12  180.149.128.9  154.18 ms  AS23724  China Beijing ChinaTelecom

移动去程

去程也走了cf的线路

移动回程

移动回程走了cn2 gia

Traceroute to China, Beijing CM (TCP Mode, Max 30 Hop)
============================================================
traceroute to 211.136.25.153 (211.136.25.153), 30 hops max, 60 byte packets
 1  154.17.0.1  13.45 ms  AS174,AS54574  United States California Los Angeles cogentco.com
 2  193.41.248.225  0.36 ms  AS54574  United States California Los Angeles dmit.io
 3  193.41.248.130  0.75 ms  AS54574  United States California Los Angeles dmit.io
 4  59.43.181.145  125.92 ms  *  China Shanghai ChinaTelecom
 5  *
 6  59.43.130.213  132.33 ms  *  China Shanghai ChinaTelecom
 7  59.43.80.14  137.23 ms  *  China Shanghai ChinaTelecom
 8  *
 9  *
10  *
11  221.183.9.197  239.95 ms  AS9808  China Beijing ChinaMobile
12  111.24.2.241  173.01 ms  AS9808  China Beijing ChinaMobile
13  111.24.2.134  171.96 ms  AS9808  China Beijing ChinaMobile
14  211.136.67.106  174.86 ms  AS56048  China Beijing ChinaMobile
15  211.136.63.66  174.36 ms  AS56048  China Beijing ChinaMobile
16  211.136.95.226  172.83 ms  AS56048  China Beijing ChinaMobile
17  *
18  *
19  211.136.25.153  172.91 ms  AS56048  China Beijing ChinaMobile

联通去程

联通也是走了cf对线路

联通回程

联通回程也是走了cn2 gia

Traceroute to China, Shanghai CU (TCP Mode, Max 30 Hop)
============================================================
traceroute to 58.247.8.158 (58.247.8.158), 30 hops max, 60 byte packets
 1  154.17.0.1  12.13 ms  AS174,AS54574  United States California Los Angeles cogentco.com
 2  193.41.248.225  0.41 ms  AS54574  United States California Los Angeles dmit.io
 3  193.41.248.130  0.57 ms  AS54574  United States California Los Angeles dmit.io
 4  59.43.189.37  126.69 ms  *  China Shanghai ChinaTelecom
 5  59.43.187.69  129.01 ms  *  China Shanghai ChinaTelecom
 6  59.43.130.213  130.16 ms  *  China Shanghai ChinaTelecom
 7  *
 8  219.158.9.97  164.20 ms  AS4837  China Shanghai ChinaUnicom
 9  *
10  58.247.221.178  157.70 ms  AS17621  China Shanghai ChinaUnicom
11  139.226.225.22  158.39 ms  AS17621  China Shanghai ChinaUnicom
12  58.247.8.153  166.70 ms  AS17621  China Shanghai ChinaUnicom

5、路由掉包

晚高峰23:00测试

7、全国ping

ping值很不错啊~

8、unixbench跑分

单核跑分1684.4，可以看出amd的u很强悍！

Benchmark Run: Sat Dec 26 2020 02:37:17 - 03:05:05
2 CPUs in system; running 1 parallel copy of tests

Dhrystone 2 using register variables       40337382.1 lps   (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Double-Precision Whetstone                     7504.9 MWIPS (8.9 s, 7 samples)
Execl Throughput                               5467.7 lps   (29.9 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks       1092587.0 KBps  (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks          299266.8 KBps  (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks       2848303.6 KBps  (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Pipe Throughput                             1718871.7 lps   (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Pipe-based Context Switching                 222923.8 lps   (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Process Creation                              12354.5 lps   (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent)                   8853.1 lpm   (60.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent)                   1393.0 lpm   (60.0 s, 2 samples)
System Call Overhead                        1454974.8 lps   (10.0 s, 7 samples)

System Benchmarks Index Values               BASELINE       RESULT    INDEX
Dhrystone 2 using register variables         116700.0   40337382.1   3456.5
Double-Precision Whetstone                       55.0       7504.9   1364.5
Execl Throughput                                 43.0       5467.7   1271.6
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks          3960.0    1092587.0   2759.1
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks            1655.0     299266.8   1808.3
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks          5800.0    2848303.6   4910.9
Pipe Throughput                               12440.0    1718871.7   1381.7
Pipe-based Context Switching                   4000.0     222923.8    557.3
Process Creation                                126.0      12354.5    980.5
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent)                     42.4       8853.1   2088.0
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent)                      6.0       1393.0   2321.6
System Call Overhead                          15000.0    1454974.8    970.0
                                                                   ========
System Benchmarks Index Score                                        1684.4

------------------------------------------------------------------------
Benchmark Run: Sat Dec 26 2020 03:05:05 - 03:32:55
2 CPUs in system; running 2 parallel copies of tests

Dhrystone 2 using register variables       80842035.6 lps   (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Double-Precision Whetstone                    14976.0 MWIPS (8.9 s, 7 samples)
Execl Throughput                               7970.6 lps   (29.6 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks        752390.7 KBps  (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks          214249.0 KBps  (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks       2472099.7 KBps  (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Pipe Throughput                             3415388.3 lps   (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Pipe-based Context Switching                 444247.6 lps   (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Process Creation                              20463.4 lps   (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent)                  10880.3 lpm   (60.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent)                   1462.4 lpm   (60.0 s, 2 samples)
System Call Overhead                        2209897.5 lps   (10.0 s, 7 samples)

System Benchmarks Index Values               BASELINE       RESULT    INDEX
Dhrystone 2 using register variables         116700.0   80842035.6   6927.3
Double-Precision Whetstone                       55.0      14976.0   2722.9
Execl Throughput                                 43.0       7970.6   1853.6
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks          3960.0     752390.7   1900.0
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks            1655.0     214249.0   1294.6
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks          5800.0    2472099.7   4262.2
Pipe Throughput                               12440.0    3415388.3   2745.5
Pipe-based Context Switching                   4000.0     444247.6   1110.6
Process Creation                                126.0      20463.4   1624.1
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent)                     42.4      10880.3   2566.1
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent)                      6.0       1462.4   2437.3
System Call Overhead                          15000.0    2209897.5   1473.3
                                                                   ========
System Benchmarks Index Score                                        2248.8

9、江苏电信本地上传下载

电信上传和下载都能跑满~

上传：

下载：

10、最后

总结线路：去程走的是163 Cloudflare，三网回程 CN2GIA，抗ddos，线路非常不错。如果你在找一款抗ddos，又走的cn2 gia线路的机器，那么dmit的这款很符合你的要求。

缺点，价格贵，最便宜的打完8折，都要11刀。不过非常适合用来建站！！至于联通的拉跨可能因为Cloudflare没有联通直连的原因~~

至于主打的5Tbps+ DDoS Protection，cloudflare抗国外应该有5T, 但抗国内量只有不到100G！！！